Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Final Draft with Reflection

For this assignment I learned a lot about many of the things discussed in class such as ethos, pathos, and logos, and rhetoric. I also learned concessions and counterarguments. It was helpful to understand how writers explain an argument to an audience.  Here is my final draft.

Brady Terry
Professor Debra Reece
Eng. 2010
Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Rhetorical Analysis
            I have chosen to do a Rhetorical Analysis on an article titled, “Inside the ‘Doomsday Vault’ Hope for Survival.”  The article was written by Reed Karaim and was published in the Global Researcher on November, 6, 2012.  The article talks about the loss of Biodiversity in the world’s crops and its effects on us. Karaim tells us about a collection of seeds that are stored in vaults in various locations around the world in case of a worldwide catastrophe.  He also addresses the decline in the biodiversity of the world’s crops due to genetic alterations for faster yield a time and more a abundant harvest.
            I believe that the author did a great job at presenting the information. I feel this way because he was very good at convincing me that the world is in need of change.  More specifically we need to change the way we look at farming, and need to preserve more of the different plant species.  This was because of the information he presented and the way in which it was presented.
 He directed the article mainly to Farmers and Biologists by stating, “Mooney and Worde are among the experts who say it’s important that the seed banks, while necessary as an emergency safeguard, not be seen as a sufficient substitute for maintaining genetic diversity on working farms around the world.  Farmers have been the custodians of biodiversity, and they need support.”(Karaim para. 12)
From this statement we can also infer that he is concerned with the loss of biodiversity and its possible side effects on life as we know it.  Loss of biodiversity causes; the instability of certain types of crops due to genetic alteration, this creates not only a national problem but also a worldwide problem. Another major problem is that the germination to harvest period for most of our staple food crops is too long for us to be able to rely on seeds alone to save us from the loss of biodiversity that we are facing.  These are some of the main points that were used. These Methods used in the different sections of his article, along with research from several individuals and groups were used to support his argument.
            The following is a more detailed analysis of some of these Methods.  One of the things that Reed states in his article is, “Genetic uniformity of major crops leaves them more vulnerable to diseases and environmental shifts like climate change.”(Karaim para. 7)  I found this information to be very sound.  Along with several other locations I found similar statements in “Campbell Essential Biology 5th Edition.”  In this book it states, “When species are lost, so are their unique genes. The genetic diversity within a population is the raw material that makes microevolution and adaptation possible.”(Simon 426)  Thus, the author’s statement helps him convince the readers of his article that the information they are reading is important and reliable.
            Another strategy used was Pathos when he states that this is a worldwide issue. He obviously feels very strongly about this as makes this claim several times. One of these times is when he states that there are now approximately 1,400 seed banks around the world containing more than 740,000 seed samples. (Kariam)  These stores are kept in an effort to preserve what biodiversity we still have.  This point is also something I believe that he is using as a concession.  He is very adamant about his argument about biodiversity, but when he talks about the seed stores he does so in a manner as if to say, these are really good things that we are doing to preserve our crop biodiversity.  This information comes from the first part of his article.  I feel this is very important because the rest of the article is all about his research and the problem at hand.  By starting his article in this manner, I feel that he reaches out first to those who might have opposing views and tells them that he understands what they believe and that he has at least somewhat of an understanding of their side of the argument.  This in turn makes his argument more reliable, and helps him to ensure his readers that it is more than just his opinion that is being presented.
            He makes a counterargument by quoting a statement by Worede that says, “They have preserved quite a bit of diversity, but their ability to crank up and produce enough seed is very low.  They can’t really do that quickly. The quality of the storage is also very variable.”(Worede)  This statement is backed up by the fact that it takes time for a plant to reach maturity. For example, one crop that people around the world use is wheat.  Wheat is planted in early spring and isn’t harvested until late August.  It can then be planted again for harvest in the winter months.  The time period necessary for gestation is too long for seeds alone to be a reliable source for saving the world from a natural disaster.
            I feel that many of the statements in the article use Pathos because they play on the emotions of people.  The author uses lots of phrases such as, “We lose everything if we lose biodiversity in the field.”(Karaim para. 12)  These statements make those who are reading start to question the way things are being done.  They also help them want to do more for the preservation of the biodiversity in the world’s crops.
            In conclusion, I would like to re-instate a few things that I observed from my analysis of this article.  I believe that the author was very convincing of his information and presented it very well. He used many of the Rhetorical strategies that we learned in class to convey and support his argument, some of which were; Ethos, Pathos, Logos, Concession, and Counter arguments.  His information was backed by his research so it wasn’t difficult to believe what he was saying.  I enjoyed analyzing this article and I am looking forward to reading more on the subject and others similar to it.  This activity has changed the way that I will look at papers from now on.



Works Cited

Karaim, Reed. "Inside the 'Doomsday Vault' Hope for Survival." (2012). Print.

Simon, Eric, Jean Dickey, and Jane Reece. "Genetic Diversity." Campbell Essential Biology. 5th ed. Lakeview: Pearson Education, 2013. 452. Print.

Worede, Melakuu, interview with GRAIN, April 22, 2009, www.grain.org/article/entries/709-melaku-worede-interv-interview-in-english.



            

No comments:

Post a Comment