Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Final Draft with Reflection

For this assignment I learned a lot about many of the things discussed in class such as ethos, pathos, and logos, and rhetoric. I also learned concessions and counterarguments. It was helpful to understand how writers explain an argument to an audience.  Here is my final draft.

Brady Terry
Professor Debra Reece
Eng. 2010
Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Rhetorical Analysis
            I have chosen to do a Rhetorical Analysis on an article titled, “Inside the ‘Doomsday Vault’ Hope for Survival.”  The article was written by Reed Karaim and was published in the Global Researcher on November, 6, 2012.  The article talks about the loss of Biodiversity in the world’s crops and its effects on us. Karaim tells us about a collection of seeds that are stored in vaults in various locations around the world in case of a worldwide catastrophe.  He also addresses the decline in the biodiversity of the world’s crops due to genetic alterations for faster yield a time and more a abundant harvest.
            I believe that the author did a great job at presenting the information. I feel this way because he was very good at convincing me that the world is in need of change.  More specifically we need to change the way we look at farming, and need to preserve more of the different plant species.  This was because of the information he presented and the way in which it was presented.
 He directed the article mainly to Farmers and Biologists by stating, “Mooney and Worde are among the experts who say it’s important that the seed banks, while necessary as an emergency safeguard, not be seen as a sufficient substitute for maintaining genetic diversity on working farms around the world.  Farmers have been the custodians of biodiversity, and they need support.”(Karaim para. 12)
From this statement we can also infer that he is concerned with the loss of biodiversity and its possible side effects on life as we know it.  Loss of biodiversity causes; the instability of certain types of crops due to genetic alteration, this creates not only a national problem but also a worldwide problem. Another major problem is that the germination to harvest period for most of our staple food crops is too long for us to be able to rely on seeds alone to save us from the loss of biodiversity that we are facing.  These are some of the main points that were used. These Methods used in the different sections of his article, along with research from several individuals and groups were used to support his argument.
            The following is a more detailed analysis of some of these Methods.  One of the things that Reed states in his article is, “Genetic uniformity of major crops leaves them more vulnerable to diseases and environmental shifts like climate change.”(Karaim para. 7)  I found this information to be very sound.  Along with several other locations I found similar statements in “Campbell Essential Biology 5th Edition.”  In this book it states, “When species are lost, so are their unique genes. The genetic diversity within a population is the raw material that makes microevolution and adaptation possible.”(Simon 426)  Thus, the author’s statement helps him convince the readers of his article that the information they are reading is important and reliable.
            Another strategy used was Pathos when he states that this is a worldwide issue. He obviously feels very strongly about this as makes this claim several times. One of these times is when he states that there are now approximately 1,400 seed banks around the world containing more than 740,000 seed samples. (Kariam)  These stores are kept in an effort to preserve what biodiversity we still have.  This point is also something I believe that he is using as a concession.  He is very adamant about his argument about biodiversity, but when he talks about the seed stores he does so in a manner as if to say, these are really good things that we are doing to preserve our crop biodiversity.  This information comes from the first part of his article.  I feel this is very important because the rest of the article is all about his research and the problem at hand.  By starting his article in this manner, I feel that he reaches out first to those who might have opposing views and tells them that he understands what they believe and that he has at least somewhat of an understanding of their side of the argument.  This in turn makes his argument more reliable, and helps him to ensure his readers that it is more than just his opinion that is being presented.
            He makes a counterargument by quoting a statement by Worede that says, “They have preserved quite a bit of diversity, but their ability to crank up and produce enough seed is very low.  They can’t really do that quickly. The quality of the storage is also very variable.”(Worede)  This statement is backed up by the fact that it takes time for a plant to reach maturity. For example, one crop that people around the world use is wheat.  Wheat is planted in early spring and isn’t harvested until late August.  It can then be planted again for harvest in the winter months.  The time period necessary for gestation is too long for seeds alone to be a reliable source for saving the world from a natural disaster.
            I feel that many of the statements in the article use Pathos because they play on the emotions of people.  The author uses lots of phrases such as, “We lose everything if we lose biodiversity in the field.”(Karaim para. 12)  These statements make those who are reading start to question the way things are being done.  They also help them want to do more for the preservation of the biodiversity in the world’s crops.
            In conclusion, I would like to re-instate a few things that I observed from my analysis of this article.  I believe that the author was very convincing of his information and presented it very well. He used many of the Rhetorical strategies that we learned in class to convey and support his argument, some of which were; Ethos, Pathos, Logos, Concession, and Counter arguments.  His information was backed by his research so it wasn’t difficult to believe what he was saying.  I enjoyed analyzing this article and I am looking forward to reading more on the subject and others similar to it.  This activity has changed the way that I will look at papers from now on.



Works Cited

Karaim, Reed. "Inside the 'Doomsday Vault' Hope for Survival." (2012). Print.

Simon, Eric, Jean Dickey, and Jane Reece. "Genetic Diversity." Campbell Essential Biology. 5th ed. Lakeview: Pearson Education, 2013. 452. Print.

Worede, Melakuu, interview with GRAIN, April 22, 2009, www.grain.org/article/entries/709-melaku-worede-interv-interview-in-english.



            

Thursday, September 18, 2014

Reading Reflection #2

     This entry comes from the reading we were assigned in our text book.  We were assigned Ch. 10 which is on Revising versus Editing.   I learned several things and one of the most important things was the difference between these two actions.  Editing is simply looking for grammatical errors such as punctuation, whereas Revising looks more into the content of the paper and examines the arguments and effectiveness of the paper.
     Some things that will help me with the revision of my own papers as well as those of the students in my class are as follows.  Thinking of pertinent questions while I read such as, is this passage effective? If not, then how can it be better?  I can also look for things that are done well and give positive feedback on those points.  The one thing that I think will help me the most however, will be to look for the Thesis and see if the argument that follows supports it clearly and firmly.

Thursday, September 11, 2014

Reading Reflection #1

     The reading from this section was on; Ethos, Pathos, and Logos.  I learned what the three different words mean.  Ethos is appeals from the character or author.  Pathos is appeals to emotion , and Logos is appeals to reason.  They are terms derived from ancient Greek writers. (From Inquiry to Academic Writing pg. 199 paragraph 4.)
     There was a comparison in the book (page 200 figure 8.1) that compared the Rhetorical Triangle to Ethos, Pathos, and Logos.  It showed that the Ethos and Author are the same, that the audience and Pathos are the same and it also showed that Logos are the words or the issues and argument which take place.
     I feel that Ethos, Pathos, and Logos can help me in my writing a Rhetorical analysis in the same ways the Rhetorical triangle and all of the things we have discussed in class have helped me.  They all seem to teach the same basic principle. For example, The book states (page 200 paragraph 2) that these three things when used in a proper balance can strengthen your argument based on your thesis, the circumstances, and your audience.  This is the same thing we learned when we talked about Rhetoric. I feel that it is important to appeal to the three as I write because they cover all of the major needs of the analysis and I will be able to write a more sound and persuasive paper. The ways that they cover this can be found in the book on pages 205, 208, and 214 under the corresponding sub-titles.
   

Saturday, September 6, 2014

Brady Terry
Debra Reece
English 2010 Writing Proposal
6 September 2014
            I have chosen to write on the article titled, “Inside the ‘Doomsday Vault,’ Hope for Survival,” written by Reed Karaim and published in ‘Global Researcher’.  I will be analyzing this article by using Rhetorical Analysis.  I chose to write on this article for several reasons.  I am still not completely decided on what field of study I would like to major in.  One field that greatly interests me is the field of biology and specifically that of wildlife biology and range management.
            The article addressed the issue of the World’s loss of biodiversity due to the genetic alteration of our crops for more efficient crop yield. It also discussed the fact that we have over 1,400 seed banks containing more than 740,000 seed samples from around the world.  It states that the purpose of these seed banks is to ensure that we can recover in case of a worldwide catastrophe.  One of the main issues addressed in the article is that of the loss of biodiversity.  Biodiversity is the sum total of different species that are contained in a geographical location.  The author, along with other conservationists believe that due to this loss in the worlds biodiversity, even our seed stores wouldn’t be enough to save us in the event of one of these worldwide catastrophe’s. This would take place because of the fact that we couldn’t produce crops fast enough to cope with the loss of existing crops.  Should it be pestilence that wipes out the crops, these seeds we have would be affected by these same diseases.
            I would like to use both inductive and deductive reasoning as part of my Rhetorical analysis. I feel that they will help me to know whether or not the writer has sufficient evidence to support his theory on the ineffectiveness of the seed banks as a hope for survival.  I will also ask questions such as, “How possible is it for us to have a worldwide disaster? What is the germination time for the seeds we have in these stores? Or, Can these plants be raised effectively in a controlled environment?” Another thing that I will be doing is looking at the different points of view to see how well they are addressed in the article. 

            I believe that this topic can be very controversial; therefore I believe many problems and/or conflicts might arise in my writing and analyzing the things discussed therein.  I believe that some of these conflicts may come internally from the writing itself.  For example, if the writer does not have sufficient evidence to support his thesis then the article may be an invalid source in and of itself. However, should the evidence be sufficient to support what is discussed on the loss of biodiversity then I believe that issue may arise from outside sources. Some of these issues could come from the farmers or consumers who are in direct correlation with the production of and the consumption of the worlds crops.

Rhetorical Analysis Reflection

     I learned a lot from the article as I performed a Rhetorical Analysis.  Reading the article in this way helped me to better understand what it was that the author was really trying to say.  It helped me to try and put myself more in his shoes rather than just look at things from my personal point of view.  One thing that I found to be an effective way of better understanding the article was to draw out the triangle with the Rhetor at the top and work my way through the other two points.
     Some of the things that I feel were strengths in the writing of my proposal were that it was on a subject that interested me, and that I wasn't just reading to memorize text.  The thing that may come as a weakness to my proposal was the amount of information present in the authors writing.  It may have been too short to be able to get very much in depth into the subject.
     This assignment was somewhat difficult due to the fact that there were several locations that my proposal had to be published. Other than that I feel like I really gained a better understanding for what Rhetorical Analysis is and how to use it effectively.

Monday, September 1, 2014

About Me

About Me

     My name is Brady Terry.  I grew up in a small town in southern Utah County.  I enjoy the outdoors and spending time with family and friends, especially my wife Nicole.  My favorite things to do in the outdoors are hunting, fishing, camping and riding horses or ATV's.  I married Nicole on march 21st 2014. She is the love of my life and I couldn't be happier than when I'm with her.
     My most recent writing experiences have been for classes I took during last fall's semester.  I haven't taken an English class since before my mission, but I enjoyed the class that I took prior to my leaving and learned a lot.  I had a great teacher who wouldn't give up on me and was a great influence in my life.
     I hope to be able to increase my abilities as a writer this semester through concepts that I will learn in this class.  I would also like to learn more on Rhetoric so that I can better express myself through words in future classes.