Sunday, December 7, 2014

issues paper reflection

Brady Terry
Professor Debra Reece
English 2010
December 7, 2014
Final Draft reflection
            There has been a lot that has gone in to this paper.  After a proposal several reflections and many revisions to my draft, I feel like I have a decent paper that conveys the message I want my readers to hear.  I worked with my workshop group in lots of the revising.  They had some great input and really helped me to polish up my paper.  As the paper developed I continued researching and studying deeper into the subject and I also pulled from many personal experiences. 
            I learned that it is very important to use rhetoric when creating an argument.  If you write a great paper but don’t gear or present it to the correct audience, then it is to no avail.  You have to be conscious of the topic and issue at hand and be able to present the information in an understandable way to those who will be your directed audience.  This in turn allows the argument to develop properly and when paired with valid and meaningful evidence it lets readers know that you are a reliable source on the subject, and someone they can look to for answers to questions.

            The things that came naturally mostly came because of the subject.  Because it was something that I am interested in and concerned with I was able to focus and enjoy what I was writing about.  It made the writing process easier and more naturally as well.  I felt like one of the things that I learned most about and will help me most in writing papers in the future is peer revision over just simply editing.  Revision will be helpful because it will strengthen the argument of my paper by bringing other viewpoints to light and making sure that there are few to no gaps between points and paragraphs in the paper.  I learned a lot throughout the semester and will use many of my newly acquired skills in future classes.

Issues paper final draft

Brady Terry
Professor Debra Reece
English 2010          
November 14, 2014
Are the Worlds Environments at Risk?
            Biodiversity is the sum total of different species in a geographical location.  The interaction between these species is crucial for an environment to thrive.  Some say that due to un-natural causes the number of different species around the world as well as the number of individuals of certain species is declining.  As result of this decline, the interactions between species have also declined, thus harming the environments around the world.  Is there anything being done to stop this decline and protect the remaining biodiversity?  If so, is it enough to make a difference?  Many organizations have attempted to protect and restore this precious commodity we all share.  Research has shown that many instances where attempts have been made have had very diverse outcomes.  We can look at history to help us determine the most effective ways to achieve the goal of preserving biodiversity for years to come.
            A study was conducted on the topic of biodiversity in 2006, and was written about by Tom Arrandale.  The study was conducted because beekeepers were noticing a significant decline in the number of bees returning to a seemingly healthy hives.  As the study went on, some of the culprits found and deemed responsible for this rapid decline in bee numbers were; pesticides, contaminated water, decreases in pollen and furthermore, overcrowding due to the introduction of more aggressive bee species. (Arrandale)
            In an article written by Jennifer Weeks there was a great deal to be said about these non-native, or ‘invasive’ species.  An invasive species is any species that did not originate in the area where it is now found. (Weeks)  These species compete with native species for food, shelter, and living space, along with many other factors.  As with any competition, he who is strongest will prevail.  In the case of the honey bees, it was another bee species that was overtaking the population of native honey bees. (Arrandale)  However, many times the species aren’t quite as similar.  Many of the White Bark Pine trees that cover the mountains of the Western United States are dying at an alarming rate.   The cause of their death is not another tree species; rather it is a small bark eating beetle.  These small beetles feed on the bark of the trees.  They then use the trees as a host where they lay their eggs.   Doing this ensures that the young beetles will have a safe place to grow and have plenty to eat as they grow.  When the young beetles reach maturity they seek mates and new places to live.  They do this by flying to another tree and the cycle continues. These are two of the many examples of an invasive species being a significant factor in the decline of biodiversity around the world.
            From these examples we can see that invasive species can be very destructive to an environment.  The Africanized bees that are overtaking the honey bees are constantly being sought out so that they can be destroyed from their non-native home in order to give place for the native bee species to once again take hold and flourish.  However, these bees are very resilient and are very difficult to get rid of.    At one point in time, the bark beetles that are destroying the pine forests of the Western United States were controlled by the use of a pesticide called DDT.  However, this pesticide has been deemed harmful to the environment and the use of it has been discontinued.  This evidence proves that once an invasive species has been introduced into an area, it can be very difficult to entirely remove it and return the environment to its natural order.
            Pesticides like DDT can be very destructive on an environment if not controlled.  There are however, many implications for them which can help other species thrive.  Fishing was a big part of my growing up years and I still enjoy it very much.  Fishing is something that I do to relax and enjoy the outdoors.  This used to be a very popular past time around the state of Utah. However, during the past couple of decades it seems that there has been a great decline in the number of people who take part in this leisurely activity.  One thing I have noticed is that there are many mosquitos and other bugs around the lake, more so than in the past.  I find that when these swarms of bugs come invade my fishing domain it is less enjoyable and I usually don’t stay as long, even if the fishing is good.  However, over the past several years the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources has taken action to control the number of lake bound bugs by spraying them at the time of their hatching.  The result is a more enjoyable fishing experience.  The Utah DWR is now hoping that more people will start fishing more as result of their spraying the bugs.  In an article published in October of 2014 they talk about the problems that have arisen due to the lack of people fishing as well as proposed changes to ensure that the fisheries will be healthy for years to come.  Lakes have a carrying capacity, which means that there are only a certain number of organisms that can live in that area.  Due to the lack of people fishing and keeping the fish that they catch the fish are over-populating certain bodies of water and there numbers are outgrowing their carrying capacities.  With increased fishing, these numbers can be reduced to a healthy level once again.  This will also ensure larger, more desirable fish for the anglers to catch. (DWR)  This use of pesticide is an example of one of its benefits to an environment.
            Wildlife and forests are not the only areas affected by the loss of biodiversity.   In the world of agriculture there has also been a significant loss in biodiversity for several reasons.  Some of these reasons are; as people we desire the better looking crops that yield the most abundant harvest, some crops are easier to grow than others, and even the fact that people in general have lost the knowledge of how to farm because of the convenience of getting what is needed at the grocery store.  For these and many other reasons we have genetically engineered many plant species to our liking and in doing so we have lost many of the previously existing plant species. 
            In another article written by Jennifer weeks titled, USDA Seeks New Farmers, she addresses the issue of the lack of new and young people with knowledge of how to farm.  One thing that she does address in her article is that there are many local farmers sharing their produce locally through farmers markets.(Weeks)  This is beneficial because it supports the local economy and allows the farmers to grow crops desired by those in that area. This in turn aids in the increase in biodiversity in those areas. 
Another article published by the Wildlife Conservation Society talks about a great success story that came through conservation efforts.  There is a rare species of deer found in the mountainous regions of Afghanistan.   The deer populations were very low, and some thought the species had gone extinct.  However, the society knew that the population was small but still existent so they created a conservation project to protect the remaining animals.  As result of this protection and by means of recent studies, there is still a small population living in these mountains.  Even though it is small, it is healthy and consists of adult males and females as well as young deer. (Sautner)
            As an avid outdoorsman I have been able to participate in many projects to improve wildlife habitat and aid in the comeback of habitats after disasters such as fires.  The Utah Division of Wildlife Services allows citizens of the state of Utah to participate in what is called the Dedicated Hunter Program.  This program allows people to receive permits to hunt deer in exchange for service hours or money.  Every year hundreds of Utahan’s participate in this program, providing hundreds of man hours of service as well as hundreds of dollars towards the preservation and protection of the environments and wildlife they all enjoy.  In return the hunters receive permits to hunt and manage the deer herds throughout the state.  There have been many great outcomes from this program, and not all of them deal directly with the deer herds alone.  One project I was able to participate in was to remove a fence that ran through a section of wetland in central Utah.  I, along with several others, spent a full day removing this fence.  Subsequently, the watershed level was raised allowing more area for the wetlands.  Now as I drive past this area I frequently see waterfowl and other wetland animals thriving in an area where they once struggled.  It makes me feel great to know that I played a part in helping preserve and protect something I love and can now share with family and friends.  Another act of preservation on a much larger scale is that taken by waterfowl hunters.  Every year hundreds of thousands of people purchase state and federal waterfowl stamps.  These stamps enable hunters to harvest waterfowl and in turn, the proceeds from the purchases of these stamps go directly to the preservation and creation of wetland habitat.  As result of this act, the populations of many species of waterfowl have been greatly aided.   One very good example is that of the Canadian goose.  In the late 1960’s these geese were put on the endangered species list.  However, with the aid of funds which were largely collected from the selling of waterfowl stamps to hunters, their numbers now range in the millions.
            After looking at the issue surrounding the loss of biodiversity and conservation efforts which are used to help maintain existing biodiversity, and restore lost biodiversity where possible, I have noticed several things.  The first that I have noticed is that there have been many things which have happened that directly affected the biodiversity of many different environments.  Thankfully, these things haven’t gone completely un-noticed.  Many groups are putting forth a conscious effort toward the protection and conservation of many species of plants and animals, thus attempting to ensure that we will be able to enjoy the environments around us for many years to come.  Sadly, many times these efforts are hindered by other factors, making it difficult for one single effort dealing with protection and preservation of biodiversity to have a significant effect.  Sometimes it may even take years to decades before preservation or conservation projects can be initiated.  Some of the fastest working and most effective ways of preservation come through hunting groups and other natural resource groups.  If we are all willing to do our part as conservationists, outdoor enthusiasts, biologists, and any others of us who play a role in protecting the environments around us, then we will be able to share and enjoy the beauties of nature in the years to come.

















Works Cited
Weeks, Jennifer. "Native Species Suffer When Invasives Thrive." CQ Researcher 17 Feb. 2012. Print. 
Weeks, Jennifer. "USDA Seeks New Farmers." CQ Researcher 10 Aug. 2012. Print.   
"Encouraging Anglers to Keep Fish." Salt Lake Tribune 2 Oct. 2014. Print.  
Sautner, Stephen, and John Delaney. "Strange, Fanged Deer Persists in Afghanistan."Wildlife Conservation Society. 13 Oct. 2014. Web. 8 Nov. 2014. <www.wcs.org/press/press-releases/strange-vampire-deer.aspx>.  
"Mystery of the Vanishing Pollinators." CQ Researcher 13 Jan. 2007. Print.


Saturday, December 6, 2014

peer review response

Brady Terry
Professor Debra Reece
English 2010
December 2, 2014
Peer Review Response and Reflection
                After listening to the responses and feedback from my peers some of the things that I will do to revise my Issues Paper will be to solidify my conclusion, and use information from other sources or personal experiences to tie the main points of my paper to my conclusion.  Another thing that I need to do is double check my facts to make sure that they are in line with actual evidence and truth and not just someone’s opinion.

                I think that this will really help me to better present the information that I would like to as well as help me to show better how I feel and what I would do to change or help what is being done.  I think that doing this will help me to have a lot stronger paper with more power and meaning.

semester reflection

Brady Terry
Professor Debra Reece
English 2010
December 6, 2014
Semester Reflection
            During the course of the semester I have learned quite a few things that will help me in the future with classes I will have to take.  First of all my writing process has changed a little over the semester.   I have learned how to incorporate many things such as rhetoric, ethos, pathos, and logos into my writing to make better and more persuasive arguments.  I have also been able to use rhetoric to help me determine the validity of an article and the effectiveness of the author in their writing.  Another thing that I have learned was on revising versus editing.  I learned that there is great value in revising over just simply editing and looking for grammatical errors. I am sure that using these aids when writing papers from now on will allow me to be more successful in my writing.  I will definitely be using the aid of my peers in revising my papers because I have learned that there is great value in getting the help and viewpoints of others in helping me revise and refine my drafts.
            Before this semester I didn’t know anything really about rhetoric.  The thing that I learned most about rhetoric is that it can be used to formulate your writing by addressing specifics, thus making it more effective.  By using audience specific language, depth of explanation and having a specific issue those who are reading will know exactly what you are talking about and will likely be more inclined to see you as a valid author and source on the topic you are writing about.  I also learned that using scholarly articles can be helpful in finding credible sources for research.
            One of the things that were difficult for me throughout the semester was the proposals.  I think they were difficult because I have never done them before and they take some getting used to.  I have always just made a brainstorm draft on paper by hand before I start writing a draft and used that as my “proposal” so it was definitely a transition I had to make for the class.  Something that I felt came pretty naturally for me was synthesizing.  I just enjoyed looking into the subject of the different articles and seeing their similarities and differences.

             I feel like some skill that I learned that will help me in the future when I write will be using the help of my peers who see things maybe a little differently than I do and having them revise my papers.  I feel like by doing this I will be able to have a better view of both sides of the arguments and I will also be able to have fewer gaps between points in my paper along with a more convincing argument.

Tuesday, November 11, 2014

ip annotated bibliography and reflection

     This was very difficult because I have never done one before and didn't know what to do.  I hope that I did it right.  

Brady Terry
Professor Debra Reece
English 2010
November 10, 2014
Annotated Bibliography
            I will be writing an issues paper on the things being done to preserve the world’s biodiversity, or the lack of things being done and possible helps for better preserving this important part of our world.  I will be writing to the general public, but I will also be directing comments towards those in positions of power who are capable of furthering the preservation of biodiversity on a larger scale.
            As part of my preparation for my writing I have selected several different sources that I would like to incorporate into the context of my paper.  
Weeks, Jennifer. "Native Species Suffer When Invasives Thrive." CQ Researcher 17 Feb. 2012. Print. 
The first article I have selected was written by Jennifer Weeks and addresses the issue of invasive species.  Invasive species are any species that is non-native to a geographical location.  It talks about how they can be destructive and even wipe out entire populations of native species.  I would like to use this article for background information as well as for a different viewpoint on the topic of things that can be done to preserve biodiversity.
Weeks, Jennifer. "USDA Seeks New Farmers." CQ Researcher 10 Aug. 2012. Print.   
I chose to use this article as well because, even though it is from the same author, it shows a different way that we can all be more active in preserving biodiversity.   I would like to use it as part of my argument as evidence with benefits attached.
"Encouraging Anglers to Keep Fish." Salt Lake Tribune 2 Oct. 2014. Print.  
This was published by the “Utah Division Of Natural Resources.”   It talks about the fisheries, or bodies of water in Utah where you can go fishing and some of the problems that are arising from the lack of fishing.  This article will give me some great evidence as well as some background information as to things that have happened but have simply become, “Things of the past”.  I will then use it to show things that can be re-implemented into our modern society.
Sautner, Stephen, and John Delaney. "Strange, Fanged Deer Persists in Afghanistan."Wildlife Conservation Society. 13 Oct. 2014. Web. 8 Nov. 2014. <www.wcs.org/press/press-releases/strange-vampire-deer.aspx>.  
It talks about a rare breed of deer in Afghanistan that has made a comeback due to conservation efforts.  I will be using it for some of my counter arguments.
            At this point I only have one more article. "Mystery of the Vanishing Pollinators." CQ Researcher 13 Jan. 2007. Print.

 In his article he talks about a dramatic decline in the United States’ honeybee population.  He talks about the use for and necessity for the bees and I feel that it will give me some evidence to help strengthen my paper.

Tuesday, November 4, 2014

IP Proposal

Brady Terry

Professor Debra Reece

English 2010

Tuesday, November 04, 2014

Issues Paper Proposal

            The problem or issue I have been researching is the loss of biodiversity and its negative effects on our world’s ecosystems.  Biodiversity is essentially the sum total of different organisms in a given area. 
            I chose to study biodiversity because I feel that it is important to have a diverse ecosystem in order for it to be healthy.  As I read these articles I feel like they are trying to push for help in certain areas but aren’t very specific in what they want.  I also feel like they are avoiding many of the things that are actively being done to preserve biodiversity around the world.
            In the articles that I have been studying, the authors strongly believe that due to our poor care or lack of use of the world’s natural resources, we have lost a large portion of the biodiversity we once had.  I began by rhetorically analyzing an article by Reed Karaim.  I believe it was well written and had very sound information.  His views and statements matched those of others I had previously read as well as those from authors I read from at the same time.
            After analyzing the article by Kariam, I compared and synthesized his main arguments with those of Tom Arrandale.  Many of their arguments matched up, even though both were addressing issues in different fields of study.  One point that really stood out to me that was said in almost the same way by both authors was an issue of the lack of time the people as a whole have to preserve and replenish our vanishing biodiversity. 
            However, as I think of and have studied this issue over time I was uncertain as to how long these men think we have before something absolutely terrible happens.  Another question that was raised is how much is truly being done to preserve and restore biodiversity around the world today?  Although both authors address the need for funding and help from people all around the world, they don’t clearly state what can be and what is being done to better preserve and restore the declining biodiversity. These are some of the issues I would like to delve into as I further my research.

            

Monday, October 13, 2014

synthesis rough draft

Brady Terry
Debra Reece
English 2010
Oct. 13 2014
Synthesis
Tom Arrandale and Reed Karaim both address the issue of the loss of biodiversity, or loss of diversity in nature.  Karaim addresses agricultures while Arrandale addresses the broader more worldwide issue of coastal wetlands, rainforests, and our lack of using nature to help us prevent this deterioration of earth’s ecosystems.  Both authors address the issue of time and specifically the lack thereof.
            I would like to discuss some of the main points addressed in these two articles.  These points are; the effects and possible effects that come from a loss of biodiversity, things being done to preserve biodiversity, and what needs to be done to further the preservation of biodiversity.  I would then like to address the issue of time which is talked about in both articles.  I feel like these are things that both authors discussed well, and that they both have similar arguments concerning the issues.
            There are many adverse effects that come from a loss of biodiversity.  This is the first thing that I would like to address.  In the article written by Reed Karaim he talks about how we have taken away so many different varieties of our food bearing plants as we have genetically altered them to our desire.  We have done this for several reasons. Some of which are heavier, quicker crop yields. He claims that even the seed bank in different parts of the world that store hundreds of thousands of different varieties of seeds won’t be able to help us in a worldwide catastrophe, because we have lost so much diversity and the gestation time for these plants is too long to rely upon for our safety. (Karaim) Tom Arrandale talks in his article about the effects of hurricanes and tsunamis and how they have worsened over time. He says that research has found that this is because of the destruction of coastal wetlands for housing and shrimp farming.  The destruction and removal of these critical ecosystems has taken away the buffer zone from these storms.  (Arrandale)  Both authors feel like our impact on the environment has been negative.
            Although both authors address these negitave issues that arise from the loss of biodiversity and the destruction of ecosystems, they also address some of the things being done to preserve the biodiversity that remains.  Karaim talks about farmers and how some are starting to plant more diversified crops in order to prevent total destruction of the world’s crop supply due to disease or pestilence.  He also talks about the seed banks as being a good start to biological preservation.  (Karaim)  Arrandale talks about some of the different organizations and how they are both funding and protecting earth’s natural habitats by creating hydro-electric energy from hydro-electric plants and preserving sections of forest and mountain areas around the world.  (Arrandale)
            Both authors however, feel that more needs to be done to ensure a thriving environment for the future.  Karaim states, “Farmers have been the custodians of biodiversity, and they need support.” (Karaim)  He also explains that without our support, through funding and active help, what the farmers are doing won’t be enough. (Karaim)  Arrandale addresses another similar issue.  He begins his article by talking about the need for more government funding, but shifts his focus to us not using the resources nature has given us.  He believes that costs of preservation can be cut back by using things nature has given us such as honey bees.  He gives an example from Costa Rica’s coffee plantations that once covered the country side.  He states, “Scientists calculated that native bees provided 60,000 dollars a year in pollination services to a Costa Rican coffee plantation.” ( Arrandale)  He then goes on to tell how those plantations now grow products that don’t require pollination.  Therefore, that resource that nature has given us of the honey bees is now going unused or essentially wasted. (Arrandale) Both authors are very passionate about the need for change, especially the need for added help in making a change in our actions.
            The last connection made between the articles which I would like to address is summed up by Tom Arrandale when he states, “I worry that we’re not going to have enough time.”  Both Karaim and Arrandale end their articles with similar statements.  They fear that at the rate the ecosystems are declining, we won’t be able to work fast enough without the help from people other than conservationists. However, I feel that Tom Arrandale better addresses this particular issue.  Even though both authors feel strongly about the need for change Reed Karaim doesn’t make as much of an effort to urge readers to do more and do it quickly.  This leads me to ask.  How much time is left?  What happens when this time runs out?  Have we destroyed biodiversity to the point of irreversability?
                                                                     







Works Cited
Arrandale, Tom. "Calculating the Value of Ecosystem 'Services'" CQ Researcher. 30 Nov. 2007. Web. 2 Oct. 2014. <http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/>.

Karaim, Reed. “Inside the ‘Doomsday Vault’ Hope for Survival.” (2012).  Print.